The recent upheaval in the senior management of Market Basket, a leading supermarket chain in the Northeast, serves as a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in family business succession planning. CEO Arthur T. Demoulas’s has been suspended allegedly because he is planning a work stoppage and has circumventing established succession protocols to name his successors. This incident is a cautionary tale for estate planning professionals and family business owners.
At the heart of the controversy is Demoulas’s alleged attempt to appoint his children as successors without board approval. This situation underscores a breakdown in corporate governance, despite Market Basket’s operational success, including the repayment of $1.6 billion in debt. The board’s actions, perceived by Arthur T. as a “hostile takeover,” reveal the ongoing tension between family interests and business needs.
The Demoulas family has a long history of legal disputes stemming from inadequate succession planning. The initial conflict began with the absence of buy-sell agreements following co-founder George Demoulas’s death. This oversight led to extended litigation and financial turmoil, culminating in a 1997 court ruling that restructured the company’s governance.
Another crisis in 2014, where Arthur T. was also removed at the instigation of his cousin, Arthur S. Demoulas, was characterized by an employee walkout and customer boycott, was only resolved when Arthur T. bought out Arthur S. and his family interest in the company in a costly family buyout, which burdened the company with the debt only recently paid off.
In a broader context, selecting a CEO successor is complex, as is apparent in the recent announcement that Warren Buffett is stepping down from ahis management (but not board) position at Berkshire Hathaway. In family businesses, the process is further complicated both by family dynamics and by governance representing stockholders who are not in the management of the family business, as Arthur T.’s sisters are in this case. Family ties often dominate, with businesses favoring family members for leadership roles, especially when the current CEO is a family member. However, outside directors with significant shareholding can shift the decision towards external candidates. Cultural values also play a role; traditional family CEOs are more likely to choose a family member, influenced by family identity and the perceived strength of the dynasty.
Gender preferences add another layer of complexity, with a bias toward male successors despite the presence of higher qualifications of female candidates, The result is only about 23% of single-family successors are female. The process is also shaped by a long-term signaling process where candidates express interest or withdraw based on personal motivations and interactions with the current leader.
To ensure smooth transitions, effective succession planning requires formal strategies such as developing a clear succession plan, disclosing the successor’s identity, and implementing training or mentorship programs. Regardless of business size, these elements are crucial. Additionally, integrating AI and algorithms into the selection process is emerging as a tool to enhance fairness and address biases, though ethical concerns about transparency remain. Advanced models are now used to evaluate successor competencies systematically, reducing ambiguity and subjectivity.
While traditional factors like family ties and gender biases persist, there is a shift towards more transparent and effective practices through competency-based evaluations and technology use. These changes are paving the way for more inclusive and strategic successor selections in family-owned enterprises.
As Market Basket navigates this governance crisis, it underscores the need for family businesses to balance family interests with robust corporate governance to ensure long-term stability and success.
Read the full article here